finney farm

http://www.finneyfarm.org/

 

Finney Farm began in 1989 by a group of six activists who knew each other through their work in groups like EarthFirst! and publications like Live Wild or Die. They sought to live closer to their ideals, and found a 65 homestead in the Upper Skagit.  Originally a blueberry and ginseng farm and later a Girl Scout camp, the land was overgrown and had been abandoned for some years.  The original group formed a non-profit land trust to maintain the ownership of the property, and purchased an adjacent 40 acres of raw land in the early 90s.

 

Most of the original members were drawn to different endeavors within the first few years, and all eventually moved on.   Two of our current members became acquainted with the farm in 1995, and had made it their home in the late 90s.  At that time, the farm was a few different looking place—many unfinished projects, overgrown orchards, a teeny garden plot, and blackberries everywhere!   For years the main goal was to recover ground/buildings and bring the landscape back to a manageable state.  After much work, some years, and the help of many residents and visitors who came and went…the land was much improved and we felt that we could finally devote some energy to starting new projects and endeavors which have included a half acre forest garden, expansive gardens including nearly 2 acres in annual food production and 2 acres in perennials/orchards, two large commercial greenhouses, riparian planting, cabins (timber frame, recycled materials), barn addition, and much more-using a plan that we have devised with permaculture and community ideals.

As anarchists, we favor  a social system based on voluntary cooperation and have chosen to use consensus as our decision making process.  We have a cohesive set of bylaws and policies which reflect the needs of the community.  We also have a comprehensive plan of action including social and educational outreach programs, physical infrastructure, and more.

Cascadia Rainingman

Cascadia Rainingman

August 29th – September 1st

Our first ever Cascadia Rainingman is happening August 29th – September 1st at Finney Farm near Concrete, WA. Presentations, skillshares, workshops, discussions and debriefs during the day, with art happening throughout the weekend, and live music each night. 

Saturday: We will focus on Cascadia as it exists now, with presentations and discussions focused around groups active right now, and issues facing our region.
Sunday: will focus on Cascadia tomorrow! and be focused around networking and organizing in the upcoming years.
IN ADDITION: We’ll also have a schedule of workshops, skillshares, and other things happening which are awesome, but not specifically Cascadia related.
More than anything, we just want to create a space that brings together fellow Cascadians for an awesome weekend. 

For the weekend, we’re asking $35, but no one will be turned away. Directions will be sent upon registration!

Registration for tickets, as well as band signup, vendors, and presentations, skillshares etc is open! This is your event and time, and yours to create.

http://cascadianow.us7.list-manage.com/track/click?u=70ce9bffbc51b4e5b621a3979&id=2093014a30&e=9532d02767

FB event page: https://www.facebook.com/events/696805300394540/

local pollinator networking

Would you like to be more of a naturalist? Sharpen your artistic and scientific eye for local biodiversity? Photograph your local pollinators, and thereby contribute to a growing database on pollinator sightings?

iNaturalist is a wonderful online resource where thousands of amateur and professional naturalists post photos, help each other identify species, and communicate about their sightings. iNaturalist is made up of many different local “projects”, to which anyone can submit photographs., and the Urban Pollination Project has an iNaturalist project on pollinators.

FAQs

Q. How can I upload my photos/observations to share them as data?

1. Make an iNaturalist account.

2. Go to the link provided in this email or search “Urban Pollination” on iNaturalist to go to our project, where you will need to join it.

3. Click on “Add observations”.

a. Please enter date and location plus comments

b. If you know the species, you can enter it. If you don’t, don’t worry! You have an option to say “species unknown”, and a little box you can check that says “ID please”—if you check this box, others can help identify it and leave you notes about it.

c. Upload your photos by clicking in the box that says “Select one or more photos” and searching for the correct file on your own computer. You can also choose to “sync observations with photo metadata”, meaning that if the photo comes tagged with date and GPS location, it will automatically be added.

You can upload directly from the field if you have a smartphone, by getting the iNaturalist app (free through iTunes—just google “iNaturalist app”). Then your photos will automatically be tagged with a GPS location and a date, making them instant data! Otherwise, you can photograph with a digital camera and upload from home, making sure you have recorded date, time, and location.

If you have any trouble with iNaturalist, creating observations, adding observations to the project, or any other concerns, please feel free to email us at urbanpollinationproject@gmail.com. We’ll help as best we can. If you would like to see an example account that is full of observations, feel free to check out the one belonging to senior UPP field intern Tessa Forbes, at this link: http://www.inaturalist.org/observations/tessaf

 

vegan bee

On Speciesism and Token Gestures

The bottom line is that for any animal advocacy to bring about meaningful long term change for the billions killed each and every year for human pleasure, it needs to address speciesism. Convincing someone to give up beef for climate change, fishes to save the oceans or meat on one day a week for personal health? It merely persuades people to make token gestures for themselves — often just temporarily — rather than to initiate meaningful permanent change for other animals. People are left feeling better about choosing the other animal products they’ll invariably choose to replace the ones they may omit or use less often. They become convinced that those other options are better or more ethical choices. They’re left feeling good that they’ve done “enough” – and hey, if animal advocates are patting them on the back for it, then surely they’re doing enough, right?

Some animal advocates argue that “something is better than nothing”, assuming that getting non-vegans to shuffle animal products around is actually “something” in the first place. How is it “something” if instead of having a burger for lunch on Meatless Monday, someone instead has an omelette? How is it “something” if someone decides to stop consuming beef, but instead chooses to eat chickens or fishes? And why this false dichotomy, as if the only two options available in animal advocacy result in varying degrees of the continued deliberate exploitation of others? Is it not incredibly arrogant for us to think that although a message got through to us and we went vegan that the same could not possibly occur with others?

Those advocates insist that getting non-vegans to “lower” their animal consumption is some sort of “step in the right direction”, when the truth is that unless that direction is towards veganism, there are no actual “steps” being taken. When we try to persuade non-vegans to make small token gestures for themselves – for their health, their environment – rather than attempt to persuade them to make meaningful changes for the sake of those billions of others whose lives we steal each and every year, we are bargaining away the lives of innocents. Without addressing the underlying problem of speciesism and turning people’s focus to those others, we have no hope of seriously shifting the status quo.

Worse is that when animal advocates convey to the public that veganism is “too hard” and applaud token gestures, they actually leave the general public less willing to hear and weigh animal rights advocacy and an actual vegan message. After all, why would they listen when they’ve been told that they’ve already done enough? This is the horrible damage caused by groups like Vegan Outreach and all of the other large welfarist groups who pump their fists in the air over false victories. This is the horrible damage which we’re left to undo.

http://my-face-is-on-fire.blogspot.com/2014/06/on-speciesism-and-token-gestures.html?showComment=1404382988030

human's relation with nonhumanimals vegan quote on compassionate people eating meat

Why collapse and salvation are hard to distinguish from each other.

land animals by weight

The Impossibility of Growth Demands a New Economic System

Why collapse and salvation are hard to distinguish from each other.

Let us imagine that in 3030BC the total possessions of the people of Egypt filled one cubic metre. Let us propose that these possessions grew by 4.5% a year. How big would that stash have been by the Battle of Actium in 30BC? This is the calculation performed by the investment. The trajectory of compound growth shows that the scouring of the planet has only just begun. We simply can’t go on this way.

Go on, take a guess. Ten times the size of the pyramids? All the sand in the Sahara? The Atlantic ocean? The volume of the planet? A little more? It’s 2.5 billion billion solar systems(2). It does not take you long, pondering this outcome, to reach the paradoxical position that salvation lies in collapse.

To succeed is to destroy ourselves. To fail is to destroy ourselves. That is the bind we have created. Ignore if you must climate change, biodiversity collapse, the depletion of water, soil, minerals, oil; even if all these issues were miraculously to vanish, the mathematics of compound growth make continuity impossible.

Economic growth is an artefact of the use of fossil fuels. Before large amounts of coal were extracted, every upswing in industrial production would be met with a downswing in agricultural production, as the charcoal or horse power required by industry reduced the land available for growing food. Every prior industrial revolution collapsed, as growth could not be sustained(3). But coal broke this cycle and enabled – for a few hundred years – the phenomenon we now call sustained growth.

It was neither capitalism nor communism that made possible the progress and the pathologies (total war, the unprecedented concentration of global wealth, planetary destruction) of the modern age. It was coal, followed by oil and gas. The meta-trend, the mother narrative, is carbon-fuelled expansion. Our ideologies are mere subplots. Now, as the most accessible reserves have been exhausted, we must ransack the hidden corners of the planet to sustain our impossible proposition.

On Friday, a few days after scientists announced that the collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet is now inevitable(4), the Ecuadorean government decided that oil drilling would go ahead in the heart of the Yasuni national park(5). It had made an offer to other governments: if they gave it half the value of the oil in that part of the park, it would leave the stuff in the ground. You could see this as blackmail or you could see it as fair trade. Ecuador is poor, its oil deposits are rich: why, the government argued, should it leave them untouched without compensation when everyone else is drilling down to the inner circle of hell? It asked for $3.6bn and received $13m. The result is that Petroamazonas, a company with a colourful record of destruction and spills(6), will now enter one of the most biodiverse places on the planet, in which a hectare of rainforest is said to contain more species than exist in the entire continent of North America(7).

The UK oil company Soco is now hoping to penetrate Africa’s oldest national park, Virunga, in the Democratic Republic of Congo(8); one of the last strongholds of the mountain gorilla and the okapi, of chimpanzees and forest elephants. In Britain, where a possible 4.4 billion barrels of shale oil has just been identified in the south-east(9), the government fantasises about turning the leafy suburbs into a new Niger delta. To this end it’s changing the trespass laws to enable drilling without consent and offering lavish bribes to local people(10,11). These new reserves solve nothing. They do not end our hunger for resources; they exacerbate it.

The trajectory of compound growth shows that the scouring of the planet has only just begun. As the volume of the global economy expands, everywhere that contains something concentrated, unusual, precious will be sought out and exploited, its resources extracted and dispersed, the world’s diverse and differentiated marvels reduced to the same grey stubble.

Some people try to solve the impossible equation with the myth of dematerialisation: the claim that as processes become more efficient and gadgets are miniaturised, we use, in aggregate, fewer materials. There is no sign that this is happening. Iron ore production has risen 180% in ten years(12). The trade body Forest Industries tell us that “global paper consumption is at a record high level and it will continue to grow.”(13) If, in the digital age, we won’t reduce even our consumption of paper, what hope is there for other commodities?

Look at the lives of the super-rich, who set the pace for global consumption. Are their yachts getting smaller? Their houses? Their artworks? Their purchase of rare woods, rare fish, rare stone? Those with the means buy ever bigger houses to store the growing stash of stuff they will not live long enough to use. By unremarked accretions, ever more of the surface of the planet is used to extract, manufacture and store things we don’t need. Perhaps it’s unsurprising that fantasies about the colonisation of space – which tell us we can export our problems instead of solving them – have resurfaced(14).

As the philosopher Michael Rowan points out, the inevitabilities of compound growth mean that if last year’s predicted global growth rate for 2014 (3.1%) is sustained, even if we were miraculously to reduce the consumption of raw materials by 90% we delay the inevitable by just 75 years(15). Efficiency solves nothing while growth continues.

The inescapable failure of a society built upon growth and its destruction of the Earth’s living systems are the overwhelming facts of our existence. As a result they are mentioned almost nowhere. They are the 21st Century’s great taboo, the subjects guaranteed to alienate your friends and neighbours. We live as if trapped inside a Sunday supplement: obsessed with fame, fashion and the three dreary staples of middle class conversation: recipes, renovations and resorts. Anything but the topic that demands our attention.

Statements of the bleeding obvious, the outcomes of basic arithmetic, are treated as exotic and unpardonable distractions, while the impossible proposition by which we live is regarded as so sane and normal and unremarkable that it isn’t worthy of mention. That’s how you measure the depth of this problem: by our inability even to discuss it.

www.monbiot.com

References:

1. http://www.theoildrum.com/node/7853

2. Grantham expressed this volume as 1057 cubic metres. In his paper We Need To Talk About Growth, Michael Rowan translated this as 2.5 billion billion solar systems. (http://persuademe.com.au/need-talk-growth-need-sums-well/). This source gives the volume of the solar system (if it is treated as a sphere) at 39,629,013,196,241.7 cubic kilometres, which is roughly 40 x 1021 cubic metres. Multiplied by 2.5 billion billion, this gives 1041 cubic metres. So, unless I’ve got the wrong figure for the volume of the solar system or screwed my units up, which is eminently possible, Michael Rowan’s translation looks like an underestimate. I’ll stick with his figure though, as I don’t have much confidence in my own. Any improvements, comments or corrections via the contact form gratefully received.

3. EA Wrigley, 2010. Energy and the English Industrial Revolution. Cambridge University Press.

4. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/may/12/western-antarctic-ice…

5. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/may/23/ecuador-amazon-yasuni…

6. http://www.entornointeligente.com/articulo/2559574/ECUADOR-Gobierno-conc…

7. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/16/ecuador-approves-yasuni-ama…

8. http://www.wwf.org.uk/how_you_can_help/virunga/

9. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/may/23/fracking-report-billi…

10. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/fracking/10598473/Fracking-could…

11. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/may/23/fracking-report-billi…

12. Philippe Sibaud, 2012. Opening Pandora’s Box: The New Wave of Land Grabbing by the Extractive Industries and the Devastating Impact on Earth. The Gaia Foundation. http://www.gaiafoundation.org/opening-pandoras-box

13. http://www.forestindustries.fi/industry/paper_cardboard_converted/paper_…

14. https://www.globalonenessproject.org/library/articles/space-race-over

15. Michael Rowan, 2014. We Need To Talk About Growth (And we need to do the sums as well.) http://persuademe.com.au/need-talk-growth-need-sums-well/

<!–

–>